From Overland Park, Kansas, USA:
A medical professional told someone I know that glucose meters are deliberately designed to read low, especially at low blood glucose levels, as a safety measure. I can't believe that meter manufacturers would handicap themselves this way in the quest for FDA approval, but I found similar information. Is there any basis to this information?
While a variety of things can cause meter readings to be inaccurate (old strips, low battery, user technique), the FDA has quite strict guidelines for testing any meter. You might try looking at Performance of Three Blood Glucose Meters, by Catherine C Rheney and Julienne K Kirk, to see the kind of research that is published about meters. This article demonstrates the use of the error grid analysis (page 2 of the article). Such analysis is common and allows scientists to determine how far in error a meter is performing.
Additional comments from Jane Seley, diabetes nurse specialist:I think what you mean is that the meter says "Low" instead of an actual number when the blood glucose level is very low. This is indeed a safety mechanism because each meter is capable of giving an accurate reading within a certain range which varies from meter to meter. If the blood sugar goes below (or above) that range, it will not give a numerical answer because the accuracy is questionable outside of its proven to be accurate range.
Original posting 9 Feb 2003
Posted to Blood Tests and Insulin Injections
Last Updated: Tuesday April 06, 2010 15:09:42
This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other health care professional.
This site is published by T-1 Today, Inc. (d/b/a Children with Diabetes), a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which is responsible for its contents. Our mission is to provide education and support to families living with type 1 diabetes.
© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2016. Comments and Feedback.